One of the biggest news story of 2012 occurred in December: the Sandy Hook School shooting. I remember my first reaction to the story: 'This is happening again?

Fortunately, I post on an Internet forum, 'The Information Underground', and the moderator over there, Ognir, posted the story almost immediately after it was first reported. The thread that developed 'Connecticut state police hold a news conference in Newtown to comment on the investigation of a shooting at school' turned into what has been, IMHO, the best researched and most thoughtful thread that sprung up on the web in the 'event' aftermath.

I am not going to belabor the issue here; I will simply direct readers to go to the thread, which pulled in the broadest possible information from a plethora of websites, and thanks to the tolerance of the moderators, allowed us to examine the issue in depth, as much as humanly possible.

My conclusion was arrived at after a few weeks of exploring the topic: The 'event' was a production of the US Department of Homeland Security, making use of MSM, actors, corrupted locals, scheming politicos, money (always important) and the exhaustion and shell-shock of the American people, weary from a decade of the 'war on terror', perfidy in Washington DC, Wall Street and state and local governments.

Please remember that those of us seeking 'what really happened' in this case had only the Internet at our disposal, as opposed to 'the authorities' who had many, many tools in the bag of tricks. I believe we have proven that there is a very reasonable doubt in this case, in addition to piling up mounds of circumstantial evidence. For those unfamiliar with the rule of law, a person or persons can be INDICTED for a crime due to circumstantial evidence, but cannot be CONVICTED if there is a reasonable doubt.

Please check out 'The Information Underground' thread, as it is all there, over 40 pages worth of material


You might have seen this video: It went 'viral' on the Internet in 2011, describing the British woman talking as a racist. The UK is now under strict Orwellian political correctness laws, and criticism of 'certain ethnic groups' is a crime. Free speech can only be exercised under the threat of jail time.

Comment: This goes on in my city too, and a new caste system emerges: The Whites flee the city, leaving it at the mercy of the Blacks, with support from 'progressive WASPs and Jews who live 'far from the maddening crowd'...But ethnic Whites are too poor to move...So now Blacks have 'middle management jobs' and the new underclass is the Africans, Latinos (to some degree) and poor Indians or other immigrants who the Blacks can boss around...The new Africans are despised by American Blacks...As one of the remaining ethnic Whites, I get a 'proles eye view' of the 'new diversity'...Watch how the Whites 'punk out' and turn on Miss Emma...Notice also how Miss West criticizes Polish immigrants flooding the UK and taking British jobs...I am of Polish & Slavic descent, but I don't mind her criticism because it is the truth.........Frank D.

Emma West is an English woman who has been arrested because of her viewpoints, in particular her statement calling for the repatriation of immigrants in the United Kingdom during a dialogue between her and black immigrants in a tram. The video of the last part of this dialogue circulates on the internet under the title "My Tram Experience". It was uploaded to You Tube on November 17th, 2011 under the title "My Tram Experience" by user "ladyk89". The video shows how Emma West is almost physically attacked from behind by a black youngster and other blacks shouting anti-white statements at her such as:

"If we don't come here you guys (white/English people) don't want to work. You guys (white/English people) don't want to work we have to do the work for you."

The Black women who made this comment does not show any gratitude for being given asylum in England; instead she says that the English are lazy. But if she really believes in her own words she would go back to Africa to "do the work" for her fellow blacks, as a lot of work can still be done in Africa. She does not do that and she knows very well that she is in England not to work but to enjoy all the benefits of living in a white country, benefits that she would not have in a black African country.

Emma West had to use strong language to stand firm in a threatening situation where she was surrounded by hostile immigrants. (First, 'use the mouth'...Frank D.)

The first part has never been released. This part presumably would show the provocations by the black immigrants that started the dialogue.

Person who made cell phone video...The Black that secretly filmed Emma West and presumably also the provocateur and the one who posted the video on youtube ("ladyk89") without permission from Emma West.

Emma West

Robert Henderson
Posted on January 8, 2013

It is now 14 months since Emma West was charged with racially aggravated public order offenses after she got into an argument on a tram which led her to make loud complaint about the effects of mass immigration. This was captured by a passenger on a mobile phone and uploaded to YouTube. The details of her arrest and treatment plus a link to the incident on YouTube can be found at

Three times her trial  has been delayed, on the  third occasion in early September last year (  No further trial date was set then and to the best of my knowledge none has been set since her last appearance in court. (If anyone has more up to date information please let me know).  On each occasion the delay was ascribed to the need to complete psychiatric reports on Miss West.  It stretches credulity way beyond breaking to believe such reports could not have been completed long ago.

Why has there been this inexcusable and increasingly absurd delay?

Despite being put into a high security prison for more than a month (  and having the risk that her son be taken into care, Miss West has made it clear throughout that she wishes to plead Not Guilty.    The reason for the delay  probably lies in that plea. The liberal elite rely on people charged with such offenses being intimidated into pleading Guilty.  A full blown trial would mean public discussion of the consequences of mass immigration and the ruthless measures which the liberal elite use to suppress such debate.  They  greatly fear that because it would risk the politically correct emperor being shown to have no clothes. .

The facts of the case speak for themselves: the behavior of the authorities is not compatible with a free society.
Miss West has been threatened by UK 'Social Services' with the removal of her children, and been harassed and incarcerated by police in the UK for simply standing up for herself and her child. Provocations occur constantly on public transport, especially in 'diverse' cities, and it is usually better to 'turn the other cheek'...But sometimes a righteous anger is the only thing that certain people understand.
As I stated earlier, this is an 'old story' in terms of the attention span of the media and the general public. My whole point here is that certain issues are verboten, but that doesn't take away their importance. Only with an honest discussion can we come to an understanding of what is happening around us. Emma West simply said out loud what a great number of people feel.

Politicians are useless in these matters. The so-called British nationalist party, the BNP, most likely gave lip service to this case, but you can be sure, when push came to shove, the BNP didn't do a damn thing for Miss West. Britain has been under the rule of one of the world's most corrupt political and financial elites for centuries now, leading their people into the slaughter of many wars, but in the end, they simply herd the English onto the global plantation.

Of course, the goal is to make us all serfs and plantation workers.

I invite discussion.